Posted in Government

All candidates meeting tonight for Area A Director, CVRD

7 pm at the Union Bay Community Hall tonight.

Snippet from questionnaire candidates responded to:

1) Would you be in favour of the RD appealing to the province for the immediate banning of any future licences to draw water from common aquifers, for the purpose of resale?

Daniel Arbour – NO – The BC Water Act allows the Province to issue water licenses. There may be situations in the future where regional resale could support farming or other desirable activities in unserviced areas. I would prefer to vote on the merit of each application, even if most/all of them end up turned down.

Jim Elliott – YES – Water for sale by private individuals is not something I support, particularly from aquifers that others rely on for their water source.

2) Are you in favour of increasing the number of settlement nodes within the Regional Growth Strategy, to facilitate future development in the Comox Valley?

Jim Elliott – NO – I believe the number of settlement nodes currently is adequate for development. Future nodes should be where servicing for water,sewer, hydro and roads can be easily accessed or where lot size is adequate for individual servicing i.e. wells and septic.

Daniel Arbour – NO – At this point, there are numerous and sizeable opportunities for development within the settlement nodes framework, including in my Area (A). I favour doing a great job of supporting these first.

3) Do you support the proposed amendment to the Regional Growth Strategy to facilitate the residential development near Stotan Falls?

Daniel Arbour – NO – The land is set aside as “Rural Area”, defined as working landscape in the Regional Growth Strategy. Neither a park or a high density subdivision support the primary goals for this section, and the onus is on the developer and community together to argue the merits of a change. It is important to protect designated working landscapes, otherwise we will end up with urban sprawl across the valley. This would undermine the character and appeal of the Comox Valley.

Jim Elliott – NO – Any amendment to the RGS requires careful consideration and public input. Again, ease of servicing should also be a consideration.

4) Are you in favour of stricter bylaw regulations to combat the pollution caused by the aquaculture industry?

Jim Elliott – YES – The amount of the debris that litters Baynes sound is unacceptable and somehow needs to be addressed by the industry.

Daniel Arbour – NO – Not yet. There are problems as with other sectors, but I am more in favour to work constructively with the businesses and communities to solve those problems. Shellfish aquaculture should be one of our greenest local industries: it produces local, healthy food; it relies on healthy watersheds and ocean ecology for its products; and for the little bivalves to survive it encourages us to address climate change. Let’s implement practical solutions to the plastic pollution issue. It is my understanding industry and community leaders want to solve the problem permanently, so let’s get to it before we have to enforce.

Posted in Government

Wow – does Daniel Arbour really want to hitch his horse to the cowardly, deceptive, and secretive Union Bay Improvement District Board of Trustees wagon?

The cowardly Union Bay Improvement District Trustees are out canvassing on behalf of Daniel Arbour (running against Jim Elliott for Area A Director) – suddenly you are no longer insignificant because they want you to vote a certain way.  Are people so dense that they’re going along without asking these guys questions?  Just letting them walk away when they can’t even provide accurate minutes of the few meetings the public witnesses.  They have time to go door to door and canvas on behalf of a candidate and yet they don’t have time to answer questions about the health and safety of the water they provide to Union Bay landowners?  What is their priority here?

They are stating they campaigned against Jim Elliott when he ran for another term in April 2018.  Stating they didn’t like his politics.  Do they mean the politics when Jim Elliott was very firm about being transparent and accountable to the landowners?  What politics exactly?  Perhaps because he wasn’t a boot licker to a developer and wanted to ensure we weren’t screwed again by a lousy agreement?  Because he was concerned about a neophyte board negotiating without professional assistance (the previous board hired an expert and these guys let him go so they could negotiate directly with KIP)?

This paragraph from Daniel Arbour’s website caught my eye.  Hmm, who do you think Daniel has been listening to?

I understand infrastructure issues have been divisive for some local residents, particularly in Union Bay. Proposed developments such as the Union Bay Estates, and eventually opportunities for the K’omoks First Nation treaty lands near Royston, are supported by the Comox Valley Regional Growth Plan. Some see risks and threats, and infrastructure choices each go with their pros and cons.

If Arbour is hitching his horse to these dysfunctional individuals – does he share their beliefs or does he believe in democracy and being accountable to those who give him their vote?  The Union Bay Improvement District is rotten to the core and I am suspect of their whole hearted endorsement and campaigning door to door on behalf of this guy they love so much.

This guy is like a slick commercial.  Selling how great he is.  He’s an unknown as far as Union Bay goes and I doubt he’s gone beyond what he’s been told by good ole KIP and his UBID trustee lackeys.

Jim Elliott lives here and has already proven to be open, honest, accountable, transparent.  Jim stated throughout his term on UBID how important it was to inform the landowners and respond to their concerns – not statements only made when he wanted your vote.

I’m sure the people on Hornby think Mr. Arbour is great and would want a director from their island, but I don’t see him interested in our problems because it would take him too long to catch up on why Union Bay has problems.

Posted in UBID

Information from the only UBID Trustee who believes the landowners should be informed

The following email from Susanna Kaljur is being circulated to Union Bay landowners.

I hope you will support Jim Elliott, who is running for CVRD Area A Director 

All Candidates Meeting at Union Bay Hall Monday October 15, at 7pm.  Voting Day is Saturday October 20, 2018

According to recent sightings around Union Bay, Jim’s opponent, who resides on Hornby Island, has Ted Haraldson (UBID Chair), Lone Jednorog (she ran in October 2016 as UBID Trustee and lost), and UBID Trustee Rick Bitten, all campaigning on Jim‘sopponents behalf.

Why is this a concern?  Read on..

Currently in Union Bay we have a UBID Board majority (TH, RB, Glenn Loxam and Peter Jacques) who are making decisions (aka spending landowners’ money) which appears to benefit Kensington Island Properties (KIP) aka “Union Bay Estates” while ignoring the detrimental effects (financial costs to landowners and weak bylaws) which have direct impact landowner costs via increased parcel taxes and Union Bay’s ability to protect and maintain it’s own potable water supply and our ‘soon to be’  Water Treatment Plant, a long awaited and valuable asset for Union Bay.

It was Trustee Jim Elliott in  October            2017 who was instrumental in providing a neophyte Board and a newly hired Administrator with no previous local government experience enough guidance, technical know-how and local government experience to successfully bring the UBID Board, by unanimous consent, to a fair and New Potable Water Agreement with KIP.  In fact at the October 2017UBID Public Board meeting both the Administrator and the entire UBID Board thanked Jim profusely for his hard work on the new water agreement and his time as Acting UBID Chair during August and September 2017.

So what happened?  It is a long sad story..

A brief history is in order:

Peter Jacques and Glenn Loxam  were elected as UBID Trustees in April 2016, in July 2016 the Board majority Anne Alcock, Carol Molstad and Allan Webb resigned in protest when it became evident that PJ and GL had been negotiating privately, without permission of the Board Majority, with Kensington Island Properties (KIP) who desperately wanted their long expired 2011 Potable Water Agreement back. The province had appointed a facilitator in February 2016. Mr. Jim S. Mattison to facilitate a new Potable Water Agreement between Union Bay Improvement District (UBID) . Mr. Mattison’s Final Report “Clean and Safe Water for Union Bay – Seeking an Agreement with UBID and KIP” was Released August 2017

See page 17 of the report for a comprehensive list of the significant concerns regarding the old water agreement and given the capacity of Langley Lake iscurrently unknown (and still is  unknown as a comprehensive  hydrological  study has not been done and the current Board majority have no interest, it seems, in pursuing one). For those who do not know, Union Bay water comes from Langley lake (a small spring fed boggy lake which is why your kettle is brown!)  and KIP’s full build out is 3,000 to 4,000 homes, which is a larger development than “Crown Isle” in Courtenay.  Union Bay currently has less than 700 households.  Facilitator Mattison’s report is an absolute must read if you want to understand the complex issues facing Union Bay Landowners today.

When the Board majority resigned in protest due to Trustees’  Glenn Loxam and Peter Jacques questionable “negotiations” with KIP, the Province decided a  By-election be held October 2016 where three Trustee were elected to replace the resigned Board; Jim Elliott (who is currently running for CVRD Area A Director) received the highest number of votes and was given the longest term ( ending April 2018) followed by Susanna Kaljur (myself, a current UBID Trustee) and Rick Bitten (also current Trustee).  Because our term was only 6 months both Rick Bitten and I had to run again in April          2017.   The results of that election are noteworthy – Union Bay April 2017 election saw the highest voter turnout ever; Rick Bitten was re-elected with 295 votes and Susanna Kaljur was re-elected with 294 votes. The community is clearly split and deeply divided, this remains true today and unfortunately for Union Bay continues to be a detriment to effective, transparent local governance which supposed make decisions based on facts and evidence. Instead the current Board majority relies on lies, hearsay, false rumors, misleading misinformation and blindly follows the developer’s (KIP) wishes as their basis in making decisions which in turn impacts Union Bay Landowners financially and in the quality and quantity of of our potable water .

Here are some of the consequences arising from decisions this Pro KIP Board majority has recently passed. Since refusing to honor the motion made by myself, Trustee Kaljur, which was voted on and passed inNovember 2017 for UBID to write a letter to CVRD to examine the pros and cons of conversion to the CVRD (one of the many excellent recommendations made by J. Mattison in his Report (see page 25 and 26)) since there are significant financial benefits to landowners of such a small community by merging with the CVRD.  Instead of following through on their own motion the Board has stalled on sending the letter to the CVRD using a variety of bogus and misleading ‘reasons’.

The UBID Board appears to be deliberatelymisleadingthe landowners regarding the actual contents of the Governance Change letter dated March 19, 2018 sent to the UBID Board by Marijke Edmondson, Director, Governance Structures. This letter is available on the UBID website.  While the recent Landowner Updates quote accurately two paragraphs (paragraph 4 and 5) encouraging UBID in “getting the construction of the water treatment plant well underway.” this last line of paragraph 3 is omitted from Landowner Updates.

Also omitted from the Land owners Updates is the key paragraph 7 of the Ministry letter which states “Given that the current local election cycle ends in less than eight months;  “the practical window of opportunity for the CVRD to request a governance study opens following the October 2018 general local [municipal] elections. At that time, a new regional district board will be in place and can set priorities for the next four years.”

Instead the Landowners Updates (of August and September/October 2018) all state that: “it is anticipated that this study will take place in late 2019 when the water treatment plant is complete..” This a false and misleading statement which does NOT reflect what the Director of Governance Ms. Edmondson stated in her letter of March 19, 2018 to the UBID Board. The landowners updates are on the UBID website as well as the letter I refer to:

Note the Ministry letter does not state we must complete the water treatment plant only to get “the water treatment plant well underway”, which UBID is doing, the site for water treatment plant is being cleared right now.

Why does the current UBID Board majority not want to consider merging with the CVRD?  You guessed it!  The Developer (KIP) doesn’t want to! IMO
and neither does Chair Ted Haraldson, who made incorrect and misleading statements in his election papers stating falsely; “joining the CVRD would mean our additional CEC credits (connection fees) created by our new development [KIP/Union Bay Estates] would NOT stay in within our community.
This statement has been publicly refuted and declared “incorrect” by both the CVRD and in local media.

What does Union Bay lose by not merging with the CVRD?  Answer:  a whole bunch of money!!!

Several times I have requested that the Trustees be given the actual projected borrowing costs – interest only for the 3 to 4 million dollars UBID has to borrow because Improvement Districts do not qualify for Infrastructure Grants or Municipal Financing, which is 2% below prime. Instead we are forced to borrow the money needed to build our water treatment plant.  Not having the projected borrowing costs inhibits the Board’s ability to make  fully informed decisions about the need to raise our parcel taxes, when to raise them and or how much to raise them?!

I was told by UBID Board meeting on October          2, 2018 “to figure it out for myself!”   So I did.

Borrowing Costs – Interest ONLY:    (according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Mortgage Calculator)

$3 Million at 3.45% amortized over 25 years            Interest paid by landowners = $1,469,713.83

$3.5 Million at 3.45% amortized over 25 years        Interest paid by landowners = $1,714,666.14

$4 Million at 3.45% amortized over 20 years           Interest paid by landowners = $1,542,980.00

$4 Million at 3.45% amortized over 25 years           Interest paid by landowners = $1,975,352.00

If you are a Union Bay landowner and you are not boiling mad at the prospect of paying close to 2 million dollars in interest payments alone then you are NOT PAYING ATTENTION…

But wait it gets worse!

Even if you wanted to pay attention and get some answers from the UBID Board and/or the Administrator you can’t. Nope, not even I, as Trustee, can get answers. The Board decided in June 2018 that landowners can NOT ask questions at Public Board meetings and must put their questions in writing 5 business days before the Public Board meeting and guess what else, even if you do send in your question 5 working days in advance the UBID Board and or Administrator still won’t answer them! I know this because several landowners have sent in questions well in advance of the Sept. 20/2018 Board meeting and the Chair declared, incorrectly, that there was no correspondence and not one question was answered. 

Evidently this is how the current board majority operates; keep landowners in the dark, don’t answer or respond to emails, censor and alter minutes so they do not actually reflect what occurred. For proof, read on;

UBID just released the June 21, 2018 Regular Board meeting minutes and there is a glaring omission of the motion (which passed unanimously) to have the Water Superintendent provide a report regarding the Island Health (VIHA) 2013 Turbidity Tree, which is a Provincial decision making tree guideline designed to help communities in determining when to issue a Boil Water Notice.  Measurements >.1 NTU’s is the threshold. It must be noted that Langley Lake is often greater than .1NTU’s especially in winter months yet no boil water notices have been issued?!  The Board’s unanimous motion to have this report submitted by the Public Works Superintendent was supposed to answer that question. Instead the Board majority and Administrator (whose job it is to write accurate minutes in a timely manner) has omitted the motion from theJune 21, 2018 minutes even though the video recording of the motion is clearly evident!  To see for yourself go to: may encounter some colorful language on this blog)

If you are feeling depressed and discouraged at this point, I hear you!

However a vote for Jim Elliott as Area A Director on Saturday        October 20, 2018 is a good start towards bringing an ethical, experienced and hardworking Area A Director to the CVRD!   The All Candidates Meeting is on Monday October 15 at  7pm at Union Bay Hall.

Full Disclosure:  Every statement I have made in this letter is backed by evidence and facts which are verifiable. I have sent this letter to Jim Elliott’s opponent as well, in hopes that he will educate himself regarding the people he has chosen to back him in this municipal election campaign.

Should you wish to unsubscribe please send me an email with “unsubscribe” in the subject line.

Best regards, Susanna Kaljur Union Bay Landowner and UBID Trustee

Posted in UBID

Providing safe potable water to landowners should be the priority of the Union Bay Improvement District Trustees – Nope

This is the speech from April 2016, about the then board taking the community in a direction he didn’t agree with.  The board had made plans to build a water treatment system.  So how come we ended up with just 4 acres of land from a developer who promised $17.4 Million in 2005 AND we’re footing a $4 Million dollar loan?

Remember why the board changed hands?  They brought this petition around and people signed it saying they didn’t want to pay for a water treatment system.  So they got elected and negotiated down from the worst agreement in the history of Union Bay!  The lousy expired 2011 WIA provided an interest free loan to Union Bay.  What did these geniuses negotiate?  4 acres of land!  Hurray…?

They are elected and who’s paying for that water filtration system BIG TIME?  Plus, they don’t want to see or hear from you.  You are insignificant – a distraction – know your place.

The minute people start running scared and can’t answer the most basic questions, I think it’s usually a sign of someone trying to cover up something they know is wrong.  Why do elected officials believe the public is a distraction?  Why do these same individuals prevent questions from being asked of them – they certainly didn’t campaign with the promise landowners are not worthy of witnessing what these guys are doing or question their actions.

The 2 Open Houses provided information on borrowing $2 Million dollars with the wrong figures on monthly payments and interest paid.  (the admin had interest of $54,000 for the whole 20 yrs amortization!)  Now it is $4 Million dollars – grand total of water treatment plant $5.5 Million dollars for 700 households.

Then there is a new firehall – $4 Million?  None of these costs include upgrades to the aging infrastructure.   Millions and millions and these guys are spending like drunken sailors.

Public Works water reports from the Union Bay Improvement District Water Superintendent  >1.0 NTU.

March 16, 2017 Public Works Water Report:  2.3 NTU

May 18, 2017 Public Works Water Report:  1.8 NTU

November Public Works Water Report:  NOTE:  Listen to the chair provide information about the NTU’s.  The Union Bay Improvement District Chair states that when the NTU’s exceed >1.0 “they could issue a boil water advisory, but they don’t”.

December 2017 Public Works Water Report:  NOTE:  part of this report that the water turbidity is good because normally November readings are >2.5 to >4.0 NTU  The Chair, reading the Water Superintendents Report states:  “more testing will be done if the water turbidity rises above 1. NTU.

January 2018 Public Works Water Report:  NOTE:  There is no video because the guy being paid big bucks as an admin failed to audio and video record.  The official recording the admin used to compile his minutes were taken from my posted audio.  From this water report the Water Superintendent again confirms his knowledge of the 1. NTU limit.


Posted in UBID

Cowardly Union Bay Improvement District’s fictional minutes of the June 21, 2018 Meeting

These guys know how they can pull the wool over most of Union Bay landowners eyes.  Most people don’t pay attention.  Go figure…

Here’s a clip of the June 21, 2018 when the admin jumped in during a discussion of the use of an outdated Turbidity Tree (for FIVE YEARS) when deciding if a boil water advisory should be issued.  The admin put forth a motion to have the water superintendent provide the board with a report at the next meeting.  The 2013 Turbidity Tree is at the bottom of this post.

The motion was voted on and passed unanimously and yet it is not in the minutes.

Who gave the admin the authority to call ‘point of order’ and ask for a vote on a motion brought by him?  When was he elected?  What was the ‘point of order’?

Not a word provided by the water superintendent and an outright refusal to answer questions regarding it.  I submitted questions asking and I know others have – they just ignore.  Poof – no mention of it in the official signed meeting minutes from June 21, 2018.

The following clip starts as Loxam is reading the Public Works Report submitted by the water superintendent and then Kaljur is recognized by the chair and she brings up the Turbidity Tree being outdated.  The board votes on the motion – where is it?

Here are the fictionalized minutes brought to you by this cowardly group.  You are being lied to and seem to be content with that.

Look at just these three Public Works Report submitted by the Water Superintendent in charge of the health and safety of the water we consume with reports of above the >.1 threshold and yet it was acceptable because he was using a previous Turbidity Tree prior to April 2013.  FIVE YEARS!  And to make it worse the board is refusing to answer questions about this unacceptable habit.

Funny, Haraldson ran on this bs:  “We must ask questions and demand answers”.



Posted in UBID

Union Bay Improvement District Secretive Empire Building and Sept. 2018 meeting video finally posted.

These guys have been spending money like the board David Godfrey was on for years and just about bankrupted the community until he and Denis Royer were turfed in 2011 right after they signed that lousy agreement with KIP all the while touting is as a gift to the community.  Standard procedure was to look at how much money was coming in and then spend, spend, spend.  Talk about history repeating itself.  Locking out the public because they are a distraction.  Lying about correspondence not being received in order to avoid those uncomfortable questions. Fiction in the meeting minutes to disguise incompetence.

The present board hired an admin with zero government experience who cries about all the extra hours he works – well no kidding when you don’t know the job.  Then this guy hires someone to do his job!  Are we paying overtime for employees who aren’t qualified?  New computers, new website which has about 5% of the content on the one erased.  New software the admin couldn’t learn.  Paying someone to come to meetings to turn on and off the new $500 plus camera purchased so the admin could record the meetings.  Nope – he screwed that up so now we pay for that too.  The admin was going to post the videos – nope he can’t do that either.  Answer correspondence – nope he’s too busy.  Ask him a follow up question and he threatens to call the police because he feels he’s being harassed.

So what have they planned to spend behind the scenes?  We will only be advised of the drunken sailor spending spree after the funds are gone.

Three staff and it takes almost 2 weeks to post the 17 minute video of the Sept. 20, 2018 meeting.

People in Union Bay will put up with anything and these guys know it.

When they come around before the next election will people blindly believe when they claim to be open, accountable, transparent and honest?

They spent I don’t know how many minutes testing the mic at the Sept. 2018 meeting and yet…  mumble mouths.  The audio recording I posted is easier to hear than theirs!

Update:  I increased the volume an uploaded the video again – should be easier to hear.