Add cleaning up the coal hills by Kensington Island Properties to the list of ‘benefits’ offered by KIP. Promises, promises.
Click this link KIP 1 year anniversary Water Filtration Ready to Go..kinda, maybe, we’re looking\
Note: No mention of developer delaying installation of filtration system until sewage in place. Why did KIP fail to advise Union Bay. How many times has KIP stated they were ready to go, just waiting for ………….something. Where the hell is this rep? Why doesn’t KIP ever face the community. Is KIP afraid of answering questions?
| Will taxpayers foot bill for coal hills cleanup in Union Bay?
By Comox Valley Record
Published: July 12, 2012 05:00 PM Updated: July 12, 2012 05:315 PM
With little fanfare or media coverage, the BC Ministry of Environment recently released the Remedial Options Feasibility Report for the Union Bay Waste Coal Pile Site in Union Bay. This “cleanup plan,” years in the making, has the desired outcome of “improvement over time” of the conditions at the Waste Coal Pile Site. Residents of the Comox Valley might find it surprising that the Waste Coal Pile Site in Union Bay, is also listed as one of the top 13 priority contaminated sites on Crown Land in British Columbia. While the report discusses various remediation alternatives, the selected remedy appears to be a “cover-only” approach using a bituminous geomembrane (BGM) and vegetative cover. The price tag for this remedy is an estimated $17 million. This Union Bay Waste Coal Pile cleanup saga should serve as a cautionary tale for those concerned about the proposed Raven Coal Mine near Fanny Bay. While it’s still not clear who will pick up the tab for the $17-million cleanup bill at Union Bay, the lessons learned from the Mount Washington mine cleanup would indicate the taxpayers of British Columbia might be on the hook once again. John Snyder,
Are the Sheeple getting restless? |
Kensington should clean up after itself
Published: July 12, 2012 05:00 PM
Updated: July 12, 2012 05:205 PM
Dear editor,
As a Union Bay resident, I am supportive of KIP’s long-range development plans for the community (homes, golf course, marina, etc.). if their plan ever materializes is, perhaps, something else.
However, I would like to express my dissatisfaction with KIP’s incomplete clearing of a section of their property along our scenic coastal highway.
For whatever reason, KIP elected to cut down a large number of beautiful trees and then leave large piles of unsightly brush, etc. on the property.
It would be a positive step forward if they would complete the clearing of this property, regardless of the progress, or lack thereof, on the rest of their project.
Heather Mueller,
Union Bay
