Union Bay Residents’ Association – a refresher

UBRA was created in 2006 and filed one financial report in 2007.  They strayed from the rules of a non-profit society and became a private club and were eventually struck.

Here is a link to my old blog which includes the one and only financial report dated Apr. 25, 2007:  http://maryreynoldsunionbayblog.blogspot.ca/2012/01/union-bay-residents-association.html

Here are a few tidbits just to jog those old memories:

http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=dd0b0eee-c39a-492f-9935-8f1dfb8511da

fake ubra Voila_Capture 2016-3-29_12-19-16_pm

It’s hard to believe some of the loudmouths from this fake association are still spewing bullshit wanting people to accept their wisdom when it comes to 34083 Yukon Inc.

Joe Smith Letter Defending the Bully Developer

I just love to see people like this stand up for 34083 Yukon Inc. and encourage people to get the facts.

I’d like to point out that Mr. Smith was one of those fine upstanding landowners who formed the Union Bay Residents’ Association and spoke as though they represented the community of Union Bay.  I’d also like to point out that the Union Bay Residents’ Association only ever filed one financial report as required by the Societies Act, and was eventually struck from the record as they didn’t keep up their standing.  This didn’t stop this group from writing letters and sending out absolute false information such as the following:

 

NOTE:  the first bullet point states:

 “KIP (Kensington Island Properties ) was prepared to spend $18 million dollars on the project this year.”

And now Joe Smith thinks the community should follow his wisdom.

Scan

NOTE: The snippet below is from Mr. Smith’s submission to the RD at the hearings in Dec. 2009 where he claims KIP has met all the requirements and goes on to list the remediation of the coal hills. Well that’s news to the rest of us. http://www.comoxvalleyrd.ca/assets/Department/Documents/KIP_at_PH_Submissions_Support_Part_5of5.pdf

joe smith from 2009 coal hills remedVoila_Capture 2016-3-23_04-20-35_pm

Doesn’t this guy already have a column or something?  There have been many letters submitted to the editor and Smith’s letter gets published.  When are the local papers going to act like a reliable news source of what is going on in the Comox Valley?  They’re just distributers for flyers passing themselves off as newspapers.  Pathetic.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Developer in question not a bully
posted Mar 23, 2016 at 11:00 AM
Dear editor,

Re: Developer playing the bully role. (Letters, March 15)

The writer must be speaking of someone else as through all the public meetings I have attended and agreements read, there is no indication that the developer has been nothing but forthcoming in both oral and written promises.

The writer refers to the self-interest of one group of residents and the gullibility of a petition-signing group saying they are uninterested and easy prey to the promise of a free water treatment facility. This promise has been stated clearly in the original Water Infrastructure Agreement and at public meetings.

The writer also did not indicate that it was nearly two-thirds of residents who signed the petition that urged the board to get the deal done. The petition was the result of a board decision to not give the developer an extension of four months needed for ground preparation, bringing in equipment and securing materials from the plant manufacturer. This brought things to a halt.

The developer was told he could not speak at UBID meetings. To inform residents he held his own public meeting on March 14 saying he would give his talk and allow for Q & A afterwards.

Unfortunately one UBID board member kept interrupting, was politely asked to wait, refused and at one point stormed off towards the exit.

In addition at least six times the developer was asked “who would own the water treatment plant”. Six times he answered UBID would own and operate the plant. To me this repeated questioning was nothing more than harassment. As for bullying, I can’t imagine how the developer kept his cool.

Letters such as the one I am responding to do nothing more than provide misinformation and promote the divisiveness the writer alludes to.

I encourage people to get the facts. All agreements are available on the CVRD website.

Joe Smith

Union Bay

And a stroll down memory lane:

Kensington setback ‘travesty of justice’
The Courtenay Comox Valley Record. Courtenay, B.C.:Mar 18, 2008. p. 1
Dear editor,

Outrageous, despicable, a travesty of justice … These are just some of the milder comments I have heard from my fellow residents in Union Bay when describing the recent decision to curtail, once again, the approval of the Kensington Island Properties Development.

We live in a democracy where decisions are supposed to be made by majority rule. It is my understanding that the majority of the residents in Union Bay want this project to go through because they feel that it is for the benefit of all — desperately needed sewage treatment, improved water supply and other essential infrastructure that will improve the quality of life not just for Union Bay but for the Comox Valley as a whole. (The Kensington project was supposed to be the start of a revitalized regional water supply initiative and sewage treatment will stop the seepage of raw human waste into Baynes Sound, to name just a few of those benefits.)

Unfortunately, there is a handful of people who seem to be working at all costs to stop this development and some of them do not even live in our community. Most recently, the Komoks Band has now decided that they have not been consulted properly. For over three years there have been open meetings inviting the public and others who think they have a vested interest in the project to have their say. It is also my understanding that numerous private meetings have been held with this particular group of people. With all due respect, how can anyone say that they were not given ample opportunity to view the plans, speak their mind or provide input?

What has not been made known to the public are the demands that these people have made of the developer in order for them to sign off on a project that is being built essentially on privately owned lands. It was recently outlined by the developer to a group of Union Bay residents, myself included, that these demands were numerous and over time would amount to an estimated $100 million. This quite frankly is unrealistic, and to me exceeds the bounds of consultation.

Canadians in general and Union Bay residents in particular are consistently respectful and accommodating to the rights of others. There has been much dialogue and debate, ample opportunity within the due process of bringing a project up for public scrutiny. However, it seems that at every turn there is someone or some group who feels that not enough time was given or that their personal agenda has not been met.

It will always be so. This is democracy. But at the end of the day, a decision must be made based on what the majority of people — in this case, residents — feel is the right course of action

For the minister to refuse to sign off and allow fourth reading for this much-needed and desired project is, with all due respect, unconscionable. To indicate that the reason for not doing so is because of not enough consultation with certain groups is an egregious error — an error that can have serious ramifications on future development, not just in Union Bay but the Comox Valley as a whole.

While the residents of Union Bay make up a small part of the Valley and an even smaller part of B.C., the majority of these residents who want this project to proceed feel that their rights are being infringed upon. What has happened to democracy? What has happened to what is fair? What has happened to common sense?

I would urge the minister and all of those other decision-makers to do what is morally, ethically and democratically right. Sign off on the project and let the residents of Union Bay, in concert with the developer, rebuild a community that at one time played a pivotal role in the development of the Comox Valley.

Joe Smith,

Union Bay

Fear-mongering tiresome
Anonymous. The Courtenay Comox Valley Record. Courtenay, B.C.:Mar 26, 2009. p. A.34
Dear editor,

As a resident of Union Bay, I attended the Comox Valley Regional District meeting at the Union Bay Community Hall on March 18.

The purpose of this public meeting was to hear presentations related to the proposed amendment of a bylaw which would change the land use of a portion of the Kensington Island Properties development.

This change would see the use of a portion of the lands known locally as the “Coal Hills” to move from Mixed Use – Commercial – Residential to Golf Course – Residential.

Included in the notes to this change was information that would see the capping of the contaminated area, public access to the foreshore with the construction of pedestrian walkways and a boardwalk, plus ongoing measures that would ensure protection of the environment.

Also included were references to agreements that have been made with the Ministry of the Environment, Department of Fisheries and the Comox Valley Regional District to use “Best Practices” and “Green Shore” initiatives to protect and enhance the Coal Hills area.

This quite frankly is a welcome change, as it would mitigate the continued seepage of toxins into Baynes Sound from these environmental disasters that have plagued the community of Union Bay for decades.

It would also reduce and limit the number of buildings in the area versus the original approved bylaw, it would provide for more green space, and would in general create a much more community-friendly development.

It was very evident that the majority of the over 100 people who attended the meeting, supported this amendment.

What surprised me was the fact that there were several supposedly environmentally conscientious groups and activists who did not support this amendment.

I cannot fathom why they would not like to see this area cleaned up using the best technological advances we have available today. I cannot understand why, when we have a private developer willing to pay for this remediation, that they continue to try and raise issues to block this much-needed restoration, and even go on to suggest ideas that in the end would necessitate the use of millions of dollars of public funds.

I cannot understand why they continue to not believe the experts, both private and governmental, who have worked diligently to solve these issues.

What I did hear was fear-mongering and calls for delay by this small representation. This is unacceptable.

Unfortunately, it is these few individuals and groups who grab attention because of their negativity. In my opinion, they are the modern-day version of “Chicken Little,” who, rather than get all the facts, runs off and tries to convince the world the sky is falling.

What I don’t see or read in any significant amount are reports about the majority of residents who live in the Baynes Sound-Union Bay area who support what the developer and their community are trying to accomplish.

I do not see reports on the amount of work, valued in the millions of dollars, that both the developer and volunteer community groups, such as the local streamkeepers and salmon enhancement folks, have undertaken to restore this sensitive area.

Yes, negativity and bad news make for good headlines, but the time has come to take into consideration that the Kensington development in Union Bay is in reality a “good news story,” not just for the local residents and the Comox Valley as a whole, but for the environment.

I would encourage all those involved — individuals, special-interest groups, politicians and the media — to take the time, get all the facts, do some research, be fair and give this project the unbiased attention it deserves.

Joe Smith,

Union Bay

Union Bay Residents’ Association and Avid Kensington Island Properties (aka KIP “Costanza”) Supporters

Although this small flock of supporters no longer have a group name/identifier, there they were at the June 17, 2015 UBID Meeting, all proud and indignant about the treatment their hero/zero was receiving.

UBRA submitted first and only financial statement May 2007

What that means is the Union Bay Residents’ Association operated under the guise of a “registered non-profit association” when in fact it morphed into a private glee club and mouthpiece for KIP Costanza.

After 3 years of failing to file a financial report, on August 27, 2010, the Union Bay Residents’ Association was struck from the Registrar and dissolved.  see bottom image.

The following from May 14, 2008, when UBRA had already failed to submit their financial statement and maintain their good standing  as a non-profit association.  In my opinion, glaringly deceitful.  Do you remember all the letters to the CVRD, papers, presentations, etc.?  I call bullshit on this lot of dolts.

Union Bay Residents Association welcomes two new members to the board at annual meeting

And the deceit continued into 2009, now 2 years without filing a financial statement as a a registered non-profit society……….

Scan 1ScanScan 2Scan 3

Click on the following image to enlarge.  Union Bay Residents’ Association is the last entry on this page.

ubra struck from Registrar of companies

Continuing the deception…..

KIP moves ahead as year ends
The Courtenay Comox Valley Record [Courtenay, B.C] 30 Dec 2009: 7.

Go, go, go, stop. Go go.

That sums up the year 2009 for the Kensington Island Properties Project. In the past four years, KIP has been a top story three times — and this annum is no exception.

The year started off relatively quietly. The Comox Valley Regional District’s bylaws were still under the legal challenge launched by the Baynes Sound Area Society for Sustainability (BSASS) in 2007 and KIP representatives tried to work where they could.

They began looking at some changes to their bylaws to allow golf course on all portions of their property, and released some marketing material about the links designed by Gil Hanse.

It was the beginning of what seemed like two tracks for the project in the early year. In February, BSASS and the CVRD had their days in court, and set about waiting for the judge’s decision.

In the same month, amendments to those challenged bylaws were introduced.

The amendments even went to public hearing

“This is a huge opportunity to deal with an environmental issue that has plagued Union Bay for decades,” said Joe Smith, speaking in favour of the course work, which would require capping the coal hills.

In April, however, nine words threatened to end KIP’s story altogether.

“Bylaws 2812 and 2813 are set aside for illegality,” wrote Justice R.D. Wilson in his judgment.

The main issue, he said, was that the CVRD had contravened the Local Government Act by changing the proposed water source for the project after the public hearing in 2006.

He added that the K’omoks First Nation had not been consulted sufficiently.

“We are not anti-development as some would make us out to be. Development that follows the local area plans and sustainable practices and makes room for public input — this is what BSASS stands for,” said spokesperson Karen Hurley.

“It is regrettable that the interests of a very small group of opponents have been permitted to override the interests of the Union Bay residents of the community at large,” said a press release from KIP.

A month later, there was no word on what would happen. The CVRD decided not to appeal, the Union Bay Residents’ Association pleaded for them to move ahead with the project and the Union Bay Improvement District struggled with planning and lost support for a fire hall proposal over questions around their future — but KIP’s reps had decided their next step.

Finally, in June, word came. KIP had applied, and the CVRD was at work on the new bylaws. It was their first priority.

“The next chapter in the Kensington development proposal unfolds this morning,” said Ralda Leroux, senior planner for the CVRD, when introducing the new bylaws in July.

Those came with an extensive referral list and First Nations Consultation Process — as well as higher-density proposals offered in exchange for sustainability initiatives.

In August, first and second reading were given. It was a fine line for directors to walk — wanting to move the project ahead efficiently, while not rushing and overlooking things.

The next few months were busy behind the scenes for those working on the KIP project: referrals were collected, updates to the bylaws worked on, studies into water were called and negotiations with the K’omoks band were held. Special meetings were held periodically to get business done in between regular monthly board dates.

In October, KIP and KFN announced they had come to an agreement — the band was now behind the project.

In November, the public hearing date was set: Dec. 7, just in time for the holidays.

When that day came, 250 people turned out to weigh in on the project. Over 33 speakers stood, 25 of them in favour of the project.

On Dec. 11, at the CVRD’s inaugural board meeting, Area A director Bruce Jolliffe said about 80 per cent of their submissions were in favour of the project.

They easily gave third reading, paving the way for approval in the new year.

reporter@comoxvalleyrecord.com

Word count: 666
(Copyright (c) 2009 Black Press Group Ltd.)

Kensington Island Properties aka The Union Bay Community Toxic Coal Hills

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

The panorama below is large.  For a smaller version, click on the image at the bottom of the post.

This is from April 3, 2010.  Only difference is the increased rate of toxic material being eroded and washed into the ocean.kensington toxic coal hills pan reduced_edited-1Yes, let’s praise Kensington Island Properties for the work on the lower portion (which has eroded) of Washer Creek 8 years ago!!!  

Is that the only thing this developer can be praised for since infecting Union Bay in 2002?  YES.  The other success was organizing a bunch of wanna bees patting them all on the head and convincing them of their untapped talent as business leaders making history in Union Bay.  They were assholes then and still are because they can’t admit (as many did) the community was sold a ‘concept’ by a developer who doesn’t give a rats ass about Union Bay, just the dollar signs.  How can these idiots still praise this windbag, blowhard, empty promises from this so called ‘developer’?   How can the VP inspire confidence based on the limited ‘success’ boasting 35 houses in Cumberland as some huge accomplishment.  The VP’s bio is pretty limited considering squat has been accomplished in the last 11 years so that’s not going to beef up that flimsy history of success now is it?  Shouldn’t the VP be approaching retirement by now?

The only way Kensington Island Properties will go ahead is if the taxpayer pays/paves the way – Kensington Island Properties is screwing this community.  Or maybe by the time Kensington Island Properties really builds a seniors residence, the VP will be one of the first residents!  IN MY OPINION, OF COURSE 🙂

kensington toxic coal hills pan reduced