Alan de Jersey does not approve of this post:
JUNE 11, 2013. Well, well, well. The threatening email authored by Kim Jonsson in 2011, displaying her deep hatred for me (we have never met) is now explained. Why would Alan de Jersey ‘expect’ Kim Jonsson to be mad at Mary Reynolds? Why did Alan de Jersey claim it was fabricated? Kim Jonsson to this day has not disputed the existence of the email. Kim Jonsson displayed some really deep feelings and desire to have someone take me down.
Since The Cumberlander is no longer in existence, the original owner no longer resides in the Valley, so no one will get hassled over me showing how I received the threatening email.
Takes on a whole new meaning when you realize someone is ‘motivated’ by intense feelings – whole different perspective. Kim Jonsson has the ability to carry out her threats and that is a danger to me. This is not the same as de Jersey’s creepy friend Bryan Baker being a complete pos sending anonymous filthy emails and his blog. This is Alan de Jersey and Kim Jonsson displaying the lengths they will go to (in my case death) in order to protect each other. How do I know at this time if Kim Jonsson’s concerns and feelings for Alan de Jersey have increased in intensity? If so, what is Kim Jonsson and Alan de Jersey planning to do in order to satisfy Ms. Jonsson’s wishes? Would certainly be interesting to see the emails exchanged between these two regarding me.
Look who showed up again in the Record. Two of the three bullies that don’t want you to find out what they’ve been doing.
Who is the ringleader here?
Who else belongs to this cowardly group? These folks seem to know an awful lot of people. Wonder how many emails are being deleted?
Mr. de Jersey is no doubt stuck in a tight spot. How many people has he encouraged to have such hatred towards someone they don’t know? Will they rally around Mr. de Jersey, Kim Jonsson and Bryan Baker defending their honour, spouting all the good work they do? Let’s get it all out in the public so people get the whole story from both sides.
For comparison, here’s what Kim Jonsson posted on Alan de Jersey’s Facebook regarding Clifford Olson.
This is what Kim Jonsson stated in her email to Alan de Jersey regarding me:
Is this the normal Alan de Jersey finds acceptable?
Mr. de Jersey continues to display the problems that have been identified within the RCMP. Individuals who view themselves above others and get an automatic ‘pass’ because of the RCMP connection.
The comment Mr. de Jersey posted regarding a restraining order was news to me and I have no idea whether it is accurate or not. Mr. de Jersey took out the comment “You are so obnoxious and unstable even your own family initiated a restraining order against you!”
I have the following questions:
If this information is in fact true, how did Mr. de Jersey become aware of it? Was it obtained through the local RCMP detachment? Does Mr. de Jersey have the authority to make this information public? Do the others involved in this supposed initiation of a restraining order know Mr. de Jersey is publicly sharing matters which no doubt are expected to remain confidential? Is there a breach in security at the local RCMP?
Why would Mr. de Jersey in an emotional outburst on The Cumberlander website directed towards me, who he claims is unstable, tell me about a restraining order which obviously was not pursued? If Mr. de Jersey believes I’m so unstable, what was his intent by bringing up something that never developed? Wouldn’t this be viewed as something really stupid for a cop to do? What is Mr. de Jersey’s motive?
Mr. de Jersey doesn’t care who he involves as he tries to squirm out of a situation.
I imagine the Cumberlander post will disappear pretty soon as Mr. de Jersey can’t take the heat.
I noticed Mr. de Jersey has removed the post he added yesterday. No wonder. This is what Alan de Jersey stated and appeared today on the Cumberlander
This is what it looks like now: http://www.thecumberlander.ca/show2139a/The_Cumberlander_is_not_Credible
EDIT Feb. 9, 2013 Mr. de Jersey has reposted his comment excluding the ‘restraining order’ comment. I believe Mr. de Jersey slipped and showed the depths he will go to in order to discredit me. I won’t be going to the police. It’s up to Crown counsel anyway. They’ll say the courts are backed up and the issue will die. I’ll let this play out in public.
Here is the ‘new’ version
The comment ‘Proved Nothing’ has me shaking my head. How do you communicate with someone who refuses to deal with the issue by diverting the attention elsewhere?
Bottom line: If Mr. de Jersey believes what he states about me, then go to the police and have me charged. I want an investigation. I have a lot to say.
The Cumberlander Feb. 4, 2013