Did Union Bay Community Club water down their standards regarding those “whose behaviour may be detrimental to the well being of the society.”

Well, what are the standards? What is the behaviour that would initiate action? Who decides the behaviour is given a thumbs up or down?

Can’t wait to see how this upstanding board handles this mess they created, fed and believed they were untouchable given their position of TRUST.

JFC. These hillbillies can’t grasp what a position of trust actually means and that so much depends on the morals of the person holding that position. If they’re not honest and fair consistently – WTF are they doing in those positions in the first place?

Same thing with a conflict of interest – I speak from experience that these people are surface thinkers and believe if they say they’re not in a conflict when challenged – you’re supposed to accept it. They think they know what a conflict is and think they’re honest so they aren’t in a conflict. Try explaining a “conflict of interest” and “the impression of a conflict of interest” being serious and they can’t get their head around that because it’s about they can only see it from their point of view. Completely and willfully ignorant.