According to them, if Jurisich did commit the actions, which he’s not admitting to, he did it because he was provoked or if he did it – it was not intentional, and also because I didn’t stop after being assaulted and threatened, it was because I did not comply with that demand or threat. Have I got that right?
That’s it? That’s the defence? They might want to have a chat with their client as it appears his lying is consistent – lies and thuggish behaviour aren’t going to help you win this case.